
Match completed Sunday (Australian Time):
NAD 3 MED 2
3 players had match winner correct
2 players (Michael, Petr) had match score correct
Our Game
Eva completed her own sensational comeback to win her fourth Prediction Challenge! Her Men’s Final prediction was just enough to edge Michael, who has to settle for the runner-up prize.
I hope all players enjoyed this Australian Open Prediction Challenge! and the chance to match wits with other tennis fans! Thank you for playing! ~ Michael
For download (PDF): Australian Open Prediction Challenge! 2022
Standings:
Overall | ||
🥇 | Eva Kafkova | 274 |
🥈 | Michael Poplawski | 270 |
3 | Wes Zetaruk | 245 |
4 | John Lo | 236 |
5 | Petr Havlik | 188 |
Men’s Final | ||
1 | Michael Poplawski | 100 |
Petr Havlik | 100 | |
3 | Eva Kafkova | 85 |
4 | Wes Zetaruk | 5 |
John Lo | 5 | |
Women’s Final | ||
1 | Eva Kafkova | 100 |
Wes Zetaruk | 100 | |
John Lo | 100 | |
4 | Michael Poplawski | 70 |
5 | Petr Havlik | 0 |
Semifinals | ||
1 | John Lo | 75 |
2 | Wes Zetaruk | 70 |
3 | Eva Kafkova | 51 |
4 | Petr Havlik | 35 |
5 | Michael Poplawski | 32 |
Quarterfinals | ||
1 | Wes Zetaruk | 70 |
2 | Michael Poplawski | 68 |
3 | John Lo | 56 |
4 | Petr Havlik | 53 |
5 | Eva Kafkova | 38 |
Prizes
🥇 $37.50 🥈 $12.50
So close!
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
Were you lucky enough to watch the final (like I did)?
That was one of the most amazing matches I’ve seen. Medvedev plays kind of a puzzling game (especially court positioning) which would allow a more experienced player at his level to come back against him.
I sure lucked out to win a prize. There was no way I would have picked Nadal to win if I was occupying a prize spot before that match!
LikeLike